So, have you heard about the Killer Cuomo COVID-19 Nursing Home Death Scandal? No? Okay, so basically at the height of the pandemic, in the spring of 2020 and around the time the naval hospital ships the Comfort and the Hope were docked at New York and California respectively, Governor Cuomo issued mandate that required some COVID-19 positive patients be moved into nursing homes regardless of remission status. Certainly a decision like this would cause question, but still they went through with it.
Judgment day began its arrival for Cuomo when New York state Attorney General Letitia James uncovered in a report that the death’s occurred in New York state area nursing homes was underreported. The report found that deaths that occurred in hospitals as a result of contracting COVID-19 from a nursing home after Cuomo’s mandate were also not reported, causing the Cuomo COVID-19 nursing home death toll to spike form 9,000 to 15,000.
Families and legislators want accountability for this, the courts authorizing the communications documents between Cuomo’s administration and nursing homes, as well as among themselves, subpoenaed. Leave it for someone like Cuomo, of course, to muck things up by blaming the experts who said asymptomatic spread wasn’t likely (this in spite of the fact that two weeks prior to his mandate Cuomo admitted on live television that asymptomatic spread was possible), and also blamed the nursing home staff.
The ball dropped for Cuomo when his top aide, Melissa DeRosa spilled the beans to a reporter that they had underreported the deaths because, in the political climate created by Trump, they were afraid Trump would use that against the Cuomo administration. DeRosa, the daught-in-law of Audrey Strauss, the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York, also said they withheld information because they weren’t sure if it would be used against them in a criminal investigation.
Democrat representative of the 18th district in Texas, Sheila Jackson-Lee has introduced a bill to the house that seeks to make a registry of gun owners, but also to restrict the ability to purchase firearms based on purchasers association.
H.R. 127 would require all Americans to have to register their firearms to include purchase and possession of ammunition. The resolution would require government notification to lend one’s firearm to another, and would also require a psychological evaluation to own a fire arm.
While you can read the the House Resolution at congress.gov, and the body of the text is published in full at the end of this article, Sheila Jackson Lee’s unconstitutional legislation is partly dissected below:
H.R. 127 Dissected
Sheila Jackson Lee, Democrat of Houston, TX, has been a proponent of gun control for a long time. This life time politician, this Coup Party traitor, who has committed acts of sedition and treason, has attempted to introduce this bill in the past. She has also been for restricting certain types of guns and ammunition, having conveniently mistaken an AR-15’s ammunition for a .50 caliber bullet. Almost as in response to this Greg Abbott, governor of Texas has talked about making the state of Texas a “Sanctuary State” for the Second Amendment.
To provide for the licensing of firearm and ammunition possession and the registration of firearms, and to prohibit the possession of certain ammunition.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES January 4, 2021
Ms. Jackson Lee introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
To provide for the licensing of firearm and ammunition possession and the registration of firearms, and to prohibit the possession of certain ammunition.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1.SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the “Sabika Sheikh Firearm Licensing and Registration Act”.
SEC. 2. LICENSING OF FIREARM AND AMMUNITION POSSESSION; REGISTRATION OF FIREARMS.
(a) Firearm Licensing And Registration System.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
“§ 932. Licensing of firearm and ammunition possession; registration of firearms
“(a) In General.—The Attorney General, through the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, shall establish a system for licensing the possession of firearms or ammunition in the United States, and for the registration with the Bureau of each firearm present in the United States.
“(b) Firearm Registration System.—
“(1) REQUIRED INFORMATION.—Under the firearm registration system, the owner of a firearm shall transmit to the Bureau—
“(A) the make, model, and serial number of the firearm, the identity of the owner of the firearm, the date the firearm was acquired by the owner, and where the firearm is or will be stored; and
“(B) a notice specifying the identity of any person to whom, and any period of time during which, the firearm will be loaned to the person.
“(2) DEADLINE FOR SUPPLYING INFORMATION.—The transmission required by paragraph (1) shall be made—
“(A) in the case of a firearm acquired before the effective date of this section, within 3 months after the effective date of this section; or
“(B) in the case of a firearm acquired on or after the effective date, on the date the owner acquires the firearm.
“(A) IN GENERAL.—The Attorney General shall establish and maintain a database of all firearms registered pursuant to this subsection.
“(B) ACCESS.—The Attorney General shall make the contents of the database accessible to all members of the public, all Federal, State, and local law enforcement authorities, all branches of the United States Armed Forces, and all State and local governments, as defined by the Bureau.
“(c) Licensing System.—
“(A) GENERAL LICENSE.—Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, the Attorney General shall issue to an individual a license to possess a firearm and ammunition if the individual—
“(i) has attained 21 years of age;
“(ii) after applying for the license—
“(I) undergoes a criminal background check conducted by the national instant criminal background check system established under section 103 of the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, and the check does not indicate that possession of a firearm by the individual would violate subsection (g) or (n) of section 922 or State law;
“(II) undergoes a psychological evaluation conducted in accordance with paragraph (2), and the evaluation does not indicate that the individual is psychologically unsuited to possess a firearm; and
“(III) successfully completes a training course, certified by the Attorney General, in the use, safety, and storage of firearms, that includes at least 24 hours of training; and
“(iii) demonstrates that, on issuance of the license, the individual will have in effect an insurance policy issued under subsection (d).
“(B) ANTIQUE FIREARM DISPLAY LICENSE.—The Attorney General shall issue to an individual a license to display an antique firearm in a residence of the individual if the individual—
“(i) is the holder of a license issued under subparagraph (A);
“(ii) supplies proof that the individual owns an antique firearm;
“(iii) describes the manner in which the firearm will be displayed in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Attorney General, and certifies that the firearm will be so displayed; and
“(iv) demonstrates that the individual has provided for storage of the firearm in a safe or facility approved by the Attorney General for the storage of firearms.
“(C) MILITARY-STYLE WEAPONS LICENSE.—The Attorney General shall issue to an individual a license to own and possess a military-style weapon if the individual—
“(i) is the holder of a license issued under subparagraph (A); and
“(ii) after applying for a license under this subparagraph, successfully completes a training course, certified by the Attorney General, in the use, safety, and storage of the weapon, that includes at least 24 hours of training and live fire training.
“(2) PSYCHOLOGICAL EVALUATION.—A psychological evaluation is conducted in accordance with this paragraph if—
“(A) the evaluation is conducted in compliance with such standards as shall be established by the Attorney General;
“(B) the evaluation is conducted by a licensed psychologist approved by the Attorney General;
“(C) as deemed necessary by the licensed psychologist involved, the evaluation included a psychological evaluation of other members of the household in which the individual resides; and
“(D) as part of the psychological evaluation, the licensed psychologist interviewed any spouse of the individual, any former spouse of the individual, and at least 2 other persons who are a member of the family of, or an associate of, the individual to further determine the state of the mental, emotional, and relational stability of the individual in relation to firearms.
“(3) DENIAL OF LICENSE.—
“(A) REQUIRED.—The Attorney General shall deny such a license to an individual if—
“(i) the individual is prohibited by Federal law from possessing a firearm; or
“(ii) the individual has been hospitalized—
“(I) with a mental illness, disturbance, or diagnosis (including depression, homicidal ideation, suicidal ideation, attempted suicide, or addiction to a controlled substance (within the meaning of the Controlled Substances Act) or alcohol), or a brain disease (including dementia or Alzheimer’s); or
“(II) on account of conduct that endangers self or others.
“(B) AUTHORIZED.—The Attorney General may deny such a license to an individual if—
“(i) the psychological evaluation referred to in paragraph (2) indicates that the individual—
“(I) has a chronic mental illness or disturbance, or a brain disease, referred to in subparagraph (A)(ii)(I);
“(II) is addicted to a controlled substance (within the meaning of the Controlled Substances Act) or alcohol; or
“(III) has attempted to commit suicide; or
“(ii) prior psychological treatment or evaluation of the individual indicated that the individual engaged in conduct that posed a danger to self or others.
“(4) SUSPENSION OF LICENSE.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—A license issued under this subsection to an individual who is under indictment for a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding 1 year is hereby suspended.
“(B) AUTHORIZED FOR LACK OF FIREARM INSURANCE.—The Attorney General may suspend a license issued under this subsection to an individual who has violated section 922(dd) in the most recent 12-month period.
“(5) REVOCATION OF LICENSE.—A license issued under this subsection to an individual who is or becomes prohibited by Federal or State law from possessing a firearm is hereby revoked. Such an individual shall immediately return the license, and surrender all firearms and ammunition owned or possessed by the individual, to the Attorney General.
“(6) EXPIRATION OF LICENSE.—A license issued to an individual under this subsection shall expire—
“(A) in the case of a license that has been in effect for less than 5 years, 1 year after issuance or renewal, as the case may be; or
“(B) in the case of a license that has been in effect for at least 5 years, 3 years after the most recent date the license is renewed.
“(7) RENEWAL OF LICENSE.—The Attorney General shall renew a license issued to an individual under this subsection if the individual—
“(A) requests the renewal by the end of the 60-day period that begins with the date the license expires;
“(B) in the 3-year period ending with the date the renewal is requested—
“(i) has met the requirement of paragraph (1)(A)(ii)(II); and
“(ii) has successfully completed a training course, certified by the Attorney General, in the use, safety, and storage of firearms, that includes at least 8 hours of training;
“(C) meets the requirement of paragraph (1)(A)(iii); and
“(D) in the case of a license issued under paragraph (1)(C), in the 2-year period ending with the date the renewal is requested, has successfully completed a training course, certified by the Attorney General, that includes at least 8 hours of training in the use of the weapon subject to the license.
“(d) Firearm Insurance.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—The Attorney General shall issue to any person who has applied for a license pursuant to subsection (c) and has paid to the Attorney General the fee specified in paragraph (2) of this subsection a policy that insures the person against liability for losses and damages resulting from the use of any firearm by the person during the 1-year period that begins with the date the policy is issued.
“(2) FEE.—The fee specified in this paragraph is $800.”.
(2) MILITARY-STYLE WEAPON DEFINED.—Section 921(a) of such title is amended by inserting after paragraph (29) the following:
“(30) The term ‘military-style weapon’ means—
“(A) any of the firearms, or copies or duplicates of the firearms in any caliber, known as—
“(i) Norinco, Mitchell, and Poly Technologies Avtomat Kalashnikovs (all models);
“(ii) Action Arms Israeli Military Industries UZI and Galil;
“(iii) Beretta Ar70 (SC–70);
“(iv) Colt AR–15;
“(v) Fabrique National FN/FAL, FN/LAR, and FNC;
“(vi) SWD M–10, M–11, M–11/9, and M–12;
“(vii) Steyr AUG;
“(viii) INTRATEC TEC–9, TEC–DC9 and TEC–22; and
“(ix) revolving cylinder shotguns, such as (or similar to) the Street Sweeper and Striker 12;
“(B) a semiautomatic rifle that has an ability to accept a detachable magazine and has at least 2 of—
“(i) a folding or telescoping stock;
“(ii) a pistol grip that protrudes conspicuously beneath the action of the weapon;
“(iii) a bayonet mount;
“(iv) a flash suppressor or threaded barrel designed to accommodate a flash suppressor; and
“(v) a grenade launcher;
“(C) a semiautomatic pistol that has an ability to accept a detachable magazine and has at least 2 of—
“(i) an ammunition magazine that attaches to the pistol outside of the pistol grip;
“(ii) a threaded barrel capable of accepting a barrel extender, flash suppressor, forward handgrip, or silencer;
“(iii) a shroud that is attached to, or partially or completely encircles, the barrel and that permits the shooter to hold the firearm with the nontrigger hand without being burned;
“(iv) a manufactured weight of 50 ounces or more when the pistol is unloaded; and
“(v) a semiautomatic version of an automatic firearm; and
“(D) a semiautomatic shotgun that has at least 2 of—
“(i) a folding or telescoping stock;
“(ii) a pistol grip that protrudes conspicuously beneath the action of the weapon;
“(iii) a fixed magazine capacity in excess of 5 rounds; and
“(iv) an ability to accept a detachable magazine.”.
(3) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections for such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following: “932. Licensing of firearm and ammunition possession; registration of firearms.”.
(4) DEADLINE FOR ESTABLISHMENT.—Within 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Attorney General shall prescribe final regulations to implement the amendments made by this subsection.
(b) Prohibitions; Penalties.—
(1) PROHIBITIONS.—Section 922 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(aa) It shall be unlawful for a person to possess a firearm or ammunition, unless—
“(1) the person is carrying a valid license issued under section 932(c)(1); and
“(2)(A) in the case of a firearm owned by the person, the firearm is registered to the person under section 932(b); or
“(B) in the case of a firearm owned by another person—
“(i) the firearm is so registered to such other person; and
“(ii) such other person has notified the Attorney General that the firearm has been loaned to the person, and the possession is during the loan period specified in the notice.
“(bb)(1) It shall be unlawful for a person to transfer a firearm or ammunition to a person who is not licensed under section 932(c)(1).
“(2) It shall be unlawful for a person to sell or give a firearm or ammunition to another person unless the person has notified the Attorney General of the sale or gift.
“(3) It shall be unlawful for a person to loan a firearm or ammunition to another person unless the person has notified the Attorney General of the loan, including the identity of such other person and the period for which the loan is made.
“(4) It shall be unlawful for a person holding a valid license issued under section 932(c)(1) to transfer a firearm to an individual who has not attained 18 years of age.
“(cc) A person who possesses a firearm or to whom a license is issued under section 932(c)(1) shall have in effect an insurance policy issued under section 932(d).”.
(2) PENALTIES.—Section 924(a) of such title is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(8) Whoever knowingly violates section 922(aa) shall be fined not less than $75,000 and not more than $150,000, imprisoned not less than 15 years and not more than 25 years, or both.
“(9)(A) Whoever knowingly violates section 922(bb)(1) shall be fined not less than $50,000 and not more than $75,000, imprisoned not less than 10 years and not more than 15 years, or both.
“(B) Whoever knowingly violates section 922(bb)(2) shall be fined not less than $30,000 and not more than $50,000, imprisoned not less than 5 years and not more than 10 years, or both.
“(C) Whoever knowingly violates section 922(bb)(3) shall be fined not less than $5,000 and not more than $10,000.
“(D) Whoever knowingly violates section 922(bb)(4) shall be fined not less than $75,000 and not more than $100,000, imprisoned not less than 15 years and not more than 25 years, or both, except that if the transferee of the firearm possess or uses the firearm during or in relation to a crime, an unintentional shooting, or suicide, the transferor shall be fined not less than $100,000 and not more than $150,000, imprisoned not less than 25 years and not more than 40 years, or both.
“(10) Whoever knowingly violates section 922(cc) shall be fined not less than $50,000 and not more than $100,000, imprisoned not less than 10 years and not more than 20 years, or both.”.
(3) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—
(A) ELIMINATION OF PROHIBITION ON ESTABLISHMENT OF CENTRALIZED FIREARM REGISTRATION SYSTEM.—Section 926(a) of such title is amended by striking the 2nd sentence.
(B) APPLICABILITY TO GOVERNMENTAL AND MILITARY FIREARMS AND AMMUNITION.—Section 925(a) of such title is amended in each of paragraphs (1) and (2), by inserting “and except for section 932,” after the 2nd comma.
(4) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this subsection shall take effect on the date final regulations are prescribed under subsection (a)(4).
SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON POSSESSION OF CERTAIN AMMUNITION.
(a) In General.—Section 922 of title 18, United States Code, as amended by section 2 of this Act, is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(dd)(1) It shall be unlawful for any person to possess ammunition that is 0.50 caliber or greater.
“(2)(A) It shall be unlawful for any person to possess a large capacity ammunition feeding device.
“(B) Subparagraph (A) shall not apply to—
“(i) the manufacture for, or possession by, the United States or a department or agency of the United States or a State or a department, agency, or political subdivision of a State, or the possession by a law enforcement officer employed by such an entity for purposes of law enforcement (whether on or off duty);
“(ii) the possession by an employee or contractor of a licensee under title I of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 on-site for purposes of establishing and maintaining an on-site physical protection system and security organization required by Federal law, or off-site for purposes of licensee-authorized training or transportation of nuclear materials;
“(iii) the manufacture or possession by a licensed manufacturer or licensed importer for the purposes of testing or experimentation authorized by the Attorney General; or
“(iv) the manufacture for, or possession by, an organization that provides firearm training and that is registered with the Attorney General, or the possession by an individual to whom such an organization is providing firearm training during and at the location of the training.”.
(b) Large Capacity Ammunition Feeding Device Defined.—Section 921(a) of such title, as amended by section 1 of this Act, is amended by inserting after paragraph (30) the following:
“(31) The term ‘large capacity ammunition feeding device’ means a magazine, belt, drum, feed strip, or similar device that has a capacity of, or that can be readily restored or converted to accept, more than 10 rounds of ammunition, but does not include an attached tubular device designed to accept, and capable of operating only with, .22 caliber rimfire ammunition.”.
(c) Penalties.—Section 924(a) of such title, as amended by section 2 of this Act, is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(11)(A) Whoever knowingly violates section 922(dd)(1) shall be fined not less than $50,000 and not more than $100,000, imprisoned not less than 10 years and not more than 20 years, or both.
“(B) Whoever knowingly violates section 922(dd)(2) shall be fined not less than $10,000 and not more than $25,000, imprisoned not less than 1 year and not more than 5 years, or both.”
Climate change poopy pants, Greta Thunberg has messed up big time. Or has she? Reports came out from the Twittersphere that climate activist and all around environmentalist brat, Greta Thunberg had ‘accidentally’ tweeted a file showing directions given to her in regard to what political speech and action she should take concerning the farmer protest in India.
The leak comes only weeks after Thunberg was reported to have said that she was going to tell a bunch of people about her “handlers.” Could the “How Dare You” high school climate activist have been a charade from the start? Is it possible that Greta Thunberg is merely another child celebrity chosen to represent the heartstrings of the climate change cult? Time will tell. In the meantime, Greta says she does indeed stand with the farmers in India
Rumored ghost writer of Hunter Biden’s new book refers to the life of the illegitimate president’s son as ‘gorgeous.’
In the blurb for Hunter’s book, which opens with “Where’s Hunter? He’s here in this book” or something to that effect, not only does the king of horror, Stephen King, grovel over a life worth writing about, he also advocates for riding the pink horse? What’s that you ask? We here at Q&A Holes have not idea, to be honest. Our guess, Adrenochrome. What’s yours? Educate us in the comments below!!!
In the wake of the Electoral Count Day supposed insurrection on January 6, 2021 in Washington D.C., evidence has surfaced identifying members of the coup as being active members of ANTIFA, Black Lives Matter, and other left and right wing extremists. One such case is that of John Sullivan, a Left-wing activist, founder of Insurgence USA, and now a figure that is being conveniently disavowed by the BLM Utah chapters and the Left in general.
As per the events of January 6th, 2021, on what would have been a typical electoral vote count day at the capitol, instead became the Million Maga March which has also been lovingly if not somewhat adamantly referred to by the Legacy Media as the “Capitol Breach” or the “Capitol Riot.” When a conference of over a million Americans descend on D.C. at the behest of one man, locals can’t help but take note. And on this day, not only were there supporters of President Donald Trump, but there were also enemies. And infiltrators. And extremists. What the motives were of these individuals may or may not be investigated. The topic of this article, for example, has already been released from custody. This in spite of the fact that he has a company called “Insurgence USA” where he sells riot gear and other items. This in spite of the fact that he has been present at several politicly polarized events and riots. What was his excuse? He was making a movie? He’s an aspiring Olympian? But, truly, the important questions are: who has been funding him? Who funded his company? Who funds his trips? Is there money laundering happening by way of payout for Uber commercials?
The question remains: Was John Sullivan a provocateur or an innocent film maker? True, the man could just be trying to make a really epic commercial for his company, but wouldn’t it stand to reason that if he were doing so he may have had to planned some part of it? Is it possible he knew of the event occurring and grifted into the situation? Considering his history in participation and planning of protests and other like community gatherings, and his lessons in riot technique and self defense, I’d say there’s money to be made in riots for young John Sullivan. John’t brother founded a political organization called Civilized Awakening, a group rumored to be tied to the Proud Boys; the Proud Boys also present on January 6th.
Pictured above is John Sullivan on CNN doing an interview with Anderson Cooper. This is almost too convenient.
How do you suppose they choose who they get on the camera? Did John call them up? Talk about connections. Never mind his partner in crime works with CNN and is doing a film on him.
At this point stop.
The narrative being built here: There were extremist Trump supporters, all MAGA people racist and hateful. This will probably be what the movie is about, and John Sullivan will go to brave film maker instead of Leftist extremist. But don’t forget his brother is pro-Trump and supposedly involved with Giuliani in some way. Why are two brothers of the same household in polar opposite political groups and fairly high up the chain: Giuliani on Twitter versus Cooper on CNN?
This is the shill part, where John Sullivan was most likely used to advance the narrative of violent, racist MAGA Trumps. And he is released from jail, no cash bond necessary, and his website that sells riot gear is still operational. With all the riots and violent rallies and protests of the Left still happening heavily in the western part of these United States of America, will we see John Sullivan or his signature ANTIFA riot gear in the streets?
While John has no formal membership with ANTIFA chapters or BLM chapters, it would seem, his presence after the Capitol “Insurrection,” and his desire to influence any in these measures are apparent, pretentious.
“I have this strange notion, we are a democracy. Some of my Republican friends and some of my Democrat friends even, occasionally say ‘If you can’t get the votes by executive order, you gotta do something.’ Things you can’t do by Executive order unless you’re a dictator. We’re a democracy. We need consensus.”
– Joe Biden, Vice President, United States of America
=The Daily Sniff=
The illegitimate president of the United States of America, Joe Biden, has been on an Executive Order frenzy since day one in office. To date, Biden has signed more than forty Executive Orders, an action he once described as one used by dictators.
One of the fallouts of this E.O. frenzy is a further clamp down on non-mask wearing travelers in at airports, rail stations, bus stations, and any public transportation as mandated in the Executive Order. The E.O. for “Promoting COVID-19 Safety in Domestic and International Travel” adds insult to the injury the American people have already suffered at the hands of quarantine, small business shut downs, and a ruined economy. The Executive Order goes into effect on February 2, 2021 and remain effective until May 11, 2021.
Some of the civil penalties travelers may incur include, “interfering with screening personnel, attempting to circumvent screening requirements, or a combination of these offenses. There has always been news about the TSA infiltrating train stations and bus stations, and unleashing their circus of security theater in more places than just the airport, but now Americans are facing fines when their pocket books are already thinning, and the illegitimate president of the United States of America, Joe Biden, has already signed additional Executive Orders destroying American jobs, raising taxes, and making medicines and other medical necessities more expensive to buy. One can only hope that Joe Biden will do so much damage in his first ninety days that the American public, including the unseen and unaccounted eighty million people whom allegedly voted for him, will recall this one term disaster.
Exemptions to Executive Order
People under two years of age
People with a disability
People who can not wear a mask due to disability
People at risk in regards to workplace, health, safety or job duty.
Join us daily for the new Q&A Holes News Break with Joe 1of2 on the E6W Network! Every Monday through Friday, Joe 1of2 will deliver a shot of true news reporting, bringing listeners the stories they may have missed otherwise! And because history is important, stick around for “Today in History” at the end of the news segment.
You can also catch Joe 1of2 on the Q & A Holes podcast and the Mr. C & MAGAdon show from time to time when he sits in as co-host or brings the show interesting and timely disclosures.
What news is Joe 1of2 curating today? Join Q & A Holes Patreon and get access to the Q & A Holes Discord community, a wealth of news, knowledge, kinship and fun! An aggregate and nexus of current events and ideas!
Killer governors like Governor Cuomo in New York and Governor Murphy in New Jersey whom murdered constituents by moving Covid positive patients in to retirement homes and nursing homes only to kill those with weakened immune systems now want to open their cities and allow citizens to eat in doors.
Governor Cuomo has said himself, “incompetent government kills.” As it turns out, Governor Cuomo’s nursing home death count might in fact be 50% higher than originally reported. The error comes from a possible misrepresentation of patient location when they passed, as opposed to the origin of the cause of illness. The discrepancy here being that the reason the patient died in the hospital is because they were infected with Covid-19 in the nursing home Governor Cuomo ordered Covid positive patients into.
Hot on the heels of people dying at the hands of the Covid-19 virus vaccine, the Whitehouse under President Select Biden has declared that there is no telling when Covid-19 will lift, and Dr. Faucci can only bet on the odds favoring several variant mutations infecting the population at a doctor’s office near you.
Biden says, “it’s about jobs, good paying union jobs; it’s about workers; building our economy back better than before. It’s a whole government approach with climate change at the center of our domestic, national security and foreign policy. It’s amassing conservation, revitalizing communities, and in the cities and in the farm lands. It’s securing environmental justice.”
Giberish. Tens of thousands of jobs were wiped out by Biden when he shut down work on the Keystone Pipeline. Laid off workers said Biden made jobs for unemployment officers because they’d need more of them to process all the unemployment claims heading their way. But don’t forget, the Keystone Pipeline was shut down in the name of climate crisis and the continued battle against the unseen enemy: C02.
Climate Crisis EOs * Ban on new leases for oil and gas drilling * Ban on fracking on federal lands * Revocation of lease for Keystone pipeline (previous week)
Who’s to say the Democrats, the Coup Party, don’t turn around and dig that oil up anyway and send that oil to China? Why not? It’s the most practical thing to do as China is part of the Paris Accords only voluntarily and have no dues to pay and no responsibility to their carbon footprint or their emissions. Can it at least be noted that the approval by Trump on the Keystone saw an environmentally sound and clean extraction system?
It was climate day at the faux White House where O’Biden, his face practically falling off, said climate day was “job day.” Still, Biden’s promises for green jobs and compliance with the Paris Accords means Americans can depend on jobs to continue disappearing. Small jobs. Independent employers. Entrepreneurs. Drivers of economy will be able to settle in to their public sector jobs processing jobless claims and required government assistance. The Republicans, the Coup Party, will most likely be complicit and not challenge or overturn these Executive Orders issued by illegitimate President Select, Joe Biden.